Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Submitted
Created by Guest
Created on Jan 14, 2025

If PCBs are passed as pointers, it is not supported in our PL1 compiler.

When clients want to see the relationship btw PL1 and IMSDB, it cannot shown. Since if PCBs are passed as pointers, it is not supported in our PL1 compiler.

Background: In our client's current PL/I program, Program Communication Blocks (PCBs) are passed as pointers to facilitate interaction with the IMS Database (IMS DB). However, our PL/I compiler does not support passing PCBs as pointers. As a result, when the client attempts to visualize the relationship between their PL/I program and IMS DB in ADDI, the relationship cannot be displayed.

Issue: When PCBs are passed as pointers in PL/I, this scenario is not supported by our PL/I compiler. Therefore, IMS DB structures and relationships are not visible in the ADDI tool.

Client's Requirement: Our client insists on using PCB pointers in their PL/I programs and is not willing to modify their codebase to work around this limitation. They expect to view IMS DB relationships and program interactions seamlessly in ADDI, which requires support for passing PCBs as pointers.

Question: Given that our client is not willing to modify their existing code and insists on using PCB pointers, what is the best approach for ensuring compatibility with their current setup in ADDI? Specifically, how can we support the use of PCB pointers in PL/I programs without requiring the client to make code changes, while also enabling IMS DB relationships to be displayed correctly in the ADDI call graph?

Idea priority Urgent