This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Upon reviewing our backlog and reviewing the number of votes for this RFE, we do not see adequate interest from the community for this RFE. As a result, this is being rejected.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Programming Languages
Product - C/C++ Compilers
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Rational
Product family - Design & development
Product - C/C++ Compilers
This is a valid feature request. RFE will be updated once it has been put into plan.
(This request was entered on my behalf by an IBM employee)
We are currently using -qsuppress and -qflag, but these are second best, because they affect the entire compilation.
What I wish to do is to compile with the strictest reasonable reporting options, but have the ability to suppress warnings locally.
This would for example enable me to encapsulate a possibly dangerous or suspect operation in a function which asserts an error if it fails, while forbidding that operation elsewhere in the code.
This enhancement would not (of course) affect the functionality we can realise, but would enable us to detect errors earlier in the development process. Since we also compile very strictly with DEC C and MSVS, this would be of most value in platform-specific code, but my experience is that most compilers detect a few errors that others do not.