Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Categories Runtime
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 10, 2012

Performance Class Monitoring Program Storage HWM fields can be non-sensically high when a program is repeatedly loaded

Performance Class Monitoring Program Storage HWM fields like PC31SHWM are sometimes non-sensically high, approaching 2 gig. This happens when a task EXEC CICS LOADs a program repeatedly without ever doing an EXEC CICS RELEASE. Even though the program is only loaded into storage once, the PC31SHWM field is incremented by the length of the program each time the EXEC CICS LOAD is done. So when PC31SHWM is really high, you don't know if it was because of this quirk, or if it was because the task really did cause lots of programs to be loaded into CICS.
.
The CICS Information Center talks about this quirk. Here is a link to this section:
.
https://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/cicsts/v4r1/topic/com.ibm.cics.ts.performance.doc/topics/dfht3_mon_progstg.html
.
There needs to be a way for these monitoring fields to only include program storage a task has caused to be loaded into CICS

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 5, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Transaction Processing
    Product - CICS Transaction Server

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Transaction Processing
    Product - CICS Transaction Server

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 19, 2013

    This requirement has been re-evaluated. Looking at current plans, it is not likely that this would be implemented in the next two CICS TS releases, so correspondingly this requirement is being rejected. You have an opportunity to resubmit in eighteen months time if you wish it to be considered then.

    We recommend using the Storage Manager statistics for the loader's program storage domain subpools as the only completely accurate view of program storage usage (which ever DSA it's in) and along with loader's statistics to determine which programs are currently loaded in storage. Just using the monitoring data is a 'single' transaction view which doesn't give an 'ideal' complete view of what's needed. For example if two transactions use the same program, there would be two high-water-marks whereas in actual fact there may only be one copy of the program in storage, Loader and Storage manager knew that by the monitoring data would be misleading in this case.