Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Categories Runtime
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 20, 2015

ENTRY POINT CONTAINER DEFINITION

We are running Java and PL/1 in an application context.

As the developers have started to integrate Java in our environment we have the need of an communication between two applications.

This all works fine, if you are not shipping data from one language to another one.

We now have discussed how our interface should look like. We think the interface must be described in and .xsd file, because then you can generate PL/1 structures and JAVA Classes. The data in the container must be shipped in XML Form, because this is best for both sides and the interface. Also it would be possible to run automated tests against the interface with an xml. With structured data this is difficult.

We now have two ways:

a) JAVA to PL/1

1) Put data to java objects and convert the object with JAXB to a xml string.
2) Put the xml to an container and call the PL/1 Program
3) call an XMLTransform in PL/1 to get the structured data out of the container.

b) PL/1 to Java (the same way in the other direction)

This all is working, but in fact you have to defne a lot of XMLTransforms and I thiink at the moment the xmlTransform is not versionable (not sure about this).

What we want is a versionable way to do this transformation at the interface point itself, so that the programer has not to code anything in the program.

We want to define an entry point and add a container with an xsd/binding to the entrypoint.

If you now call the entry point with an invoke application or an cics link and the interface realises that a container with this name exists, then it should automatic transform the data. If the program flow goes back, the data should be automaticly converted back in the same way.

On the java side (liberty) you could provide an @inject mechanism to automaticly generate objects out of the container.

As this would be included in an applicaiton, you would get an well defined interface, which is easy to handle for the developpers.

This also would have a big value for the 5.3 comunication thing....

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 27, 2020

    This requirement has been re-assessed. It is not likely that this will be implemented in the next 12-24 months and so it is being declined at this point. The requirement will be kept in the RFE system and might be reassessed in the future. You also have an opportunity to resubmit in twelve months time if you wish it to be reconsidered then.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 5, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Transaction Processing
    Product - CICS Transaction Server

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Transaction Processing
    Product - CICS Transaction Server

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 24, 2015

    This is a candidate for a future release