Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Categories Runtime
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 18, 2020

Allow use of System Symbols in CICS LIBRARY resource

Hello,
we are implementing CICS LIBRARY resources in our CICS Systems.
However we'd have appreciated being able to specify System Symbols in DSNames within the Library concatenation. As we currently use System Symbols to make products upgrades in our CICS Systems.
Currently we can't use System Symbols, so some datasets in DFHRPL can't be migrated to LIBRARY.
Thanks for your feedback.
Regards,
Yazid AGHANIM.

Idea priority Low
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 17, 2022
    Support for this is also provided in CICS TS 6.1 which is generally available from 17th June 2022.

    For more information see https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cics-ts/6.1?topic=whats-new
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 5, 2022
    Support for this is also provided in CICS TS 6.1 which is announced today April 5th and will GA June 17th 2022.

    See Announcement letter https://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/2/897/ENUS222-092/index.html&request_locale=en
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 25, 2021

    This RFE is satisfied by the resource overrides feature provided by PH30590 on CICS TS 5.6

    This feature enables a system programmer to tailor the resources for a specific CICS environment, and provides the following advantages:

    • You can take a set of CICS definitions from development through to a production environment without change. Any resource attributes can be overridden to support each environment as required.
    • In addition, you can use system-specific symbols such as the SYSIDor APPLID to override attribute values dynamically when a resource is installed.
    • You can apply standards by ensuring that certain attribute values are always turned on or off, or set to a specific value.

    For more information see https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGMCP_5.6.0/configuring/resources/resource-definition-overrides.html

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 13, 2020

    I'd like to add to this request, the ability to reference JCL (// SET) symbols also.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 17, 2020

    Also withholding vote on this RFE in favor of the more general RFE #123011.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 7, 2020

    This is a candidate for a future release

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 19, 2020

    My apologies for duplicating my comment.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 19, 2020

    This one would have my vote except that it appears to be a duplicate. See 123011.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 19, 2020

    This one would have my vote except that it appears to be a duplicate. See 123011.