Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Categories Runtime
Created by Guest
Created on Nov 29, 2013

Platform/Application DB2 Schema

To make the handling of data in a cloud environment more flexible and easy, we would like to have the possibility to add a DB2 Schema to a application and/or to a platform. I hope Schema is the right context here, but I am not realy a DB2 expert.

Also the search order for the connection should be 1) application, 2) platform, 3) region.

Why this?

With this improvement it would be easy possible to test applications in different stages and for different people. In our Case this would mean every developer has its own platform where he can deploy his applications and test them. In DB2 you would have three Schemas for the 3 test stages TEST/FACH-TEST/INTEGRATION-TEST. It is easy possible now to say developer A gets TEST Data and for this application he also want to use his own Schema if this Tables exist.

At the moment it is only possible to make one platform one one region, there is no downscale possible. Spezially for developpers I need a downscale, because I would not give one developer one Cics Region, this is completely oversized. Also sometimes I would have Spezial Testing Platforms where maybe only once a week someone is doing something.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 11, 2015

    This RFE is satisfied by CICS TS 5.3 which is generally available from December 11th 2015.

    The new private resource PACKAGESET makes the handling of DB2® data in a cloud environment easier and more flexible by enabling you to specify different DB2 collections across different environments. Using PACKAGESET, CICS can now issue the EXEC SQL SET CURRENT PACKAGESET command on behalf of the application. The PACKAGESET resource is optional, and existing mechanisms to manage different collections across different environments remain available, for example, multiple plans, dynamic plan exits, or setting the package set yourself in the application.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 6, 2015

    This RFE is satisfied by CICS TS 5.3 which was announced on October 5th 2015 with a planned general availability date of December 11th 2015.
    For more information see the announcement letter http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=an&subtype=ca&supplier=897&letternum=ENUS215-363

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 5, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Transaction Processing
    Product - CICS Transaction Server

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Transaction Processing
    Product - CICS Transaction Server

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 11, 2015

    This is something we would like to address. The RFE is being moved into 'Planned for Future release' status. Please note:
    IBM’s statements regarding its plans, directions, and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice at IBM’s sole discretion. Information regarding potential future products is intended to outline our general product direction and it should not be relied on in making a purchasing decision. The information mentioned regarding potential future products is not a commitment, promise, or legal obligation to deliver any material, code or functionality. Information about potential future products may not be incorporated into any contract. The development, release, and timing of any future features or functionality described for our products remains at our sole discretion.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 30, 2014

    For the short term, one of the two approaches documented in the previous comment should be used, but longer term a declarative approach would seem appropriate.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 15, 2014

    There are two ways the setting of the schema name could be achieved. The Schema name is the collection identifier which governs the set of packages that are searched and ultimately the tables that are referenced.

    A new version of an application will be compiled into a PDS that is uniquely referenced by an application specific library definition. The DBRM is bound into a unique package for that version of the application.

    The first way this could be achieved would be to bind the package into a unique plan per version of an application. CICS could then be configured so that a dynamic plan exit is used. The dynamic plan exit could use an EXEC CICS ASSIGN command to find the application context, ie platform name, application name, major version, minor version and micro version. Based on the application context the dynamic plan exit sets the relevant plan name to be used.

    This first method has the drawback that there are multiple plans to maintained, and also you get less thread reuse because you can only reuse a thread for the same plan.

    A second way of doing it would be to have collection id per version of the application containing the versioned package, and bind all the collections into the same plan. Now because you are using the same plan, you can reuse the thread. Now instead of using a dynamic plan exit, you statically use the same plan name. This time it would be the application itself that issued the EXEC CICS ASSIGN command to obtain the application context, then the application would issue an EXEC SQL SET CURRENT PACKAGE SET which sets the schema name, ie the collection identifier to be used.