Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Categories Runtime
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 19, 2013

EYU9XLOP is called regardless of DYNAMIC(YES) specification

I would like transactions to invoke EYU9XLOP only if DYNAMIC(YES) is specified on a transaction when a region specifies either DSRTPGM=EYU9XLOP and/or DTRPGM=EYU9XLOP

Right now, regardless of the DYNAMIC specification on the transaction, EYU9XLOP is invoked.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 5, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Transaction Processing
    Product - CICS Transaction Server

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Transaction Processing
    Product - CICS Transaction Server

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 13, 2014

    This requirement is satisfied by CICS TS 5.2 which is generally available from June 13th 2014.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 14, 2014

    This requirement is satisfied by CICS TS 5.2 which was announced 7th April 2014 with a planned general availability date of June 13th 2014. For more information see the IBM CICS Transaction Server for  z/OS, V5.2 announcement letter

    http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=an&subtype=ca&supplier=897&letternum=ENUS214-107

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 9, 2014

    This requirement is satisfied by CICS TS 5.2 which was announced 7th April 2014 with a planned general availability date of June 13th 2014. For more information see the IBM CICS Tools for  z/OS, V5.2 announcement letter

    http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=an&subtype=ca&supplier=897&letternum=ENUS214-107

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 4, 2013

    This is something we would like to address. The RFE is being moved into 'Planned for Future release' status.  Please note:
    IBM’s statements regarding its plans, directions, and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice at IBM’s sole discretion.   Information regarding potential future products is intended to outline our general product direction and it should not be relied on in making a purchasing decision. The information mentioned regarding potential future products is not a commitment, promise, or legal obligation to deliver any material, code or functionality. Information about potential future products may not be incorporated into any contract. The development, release, and timing of any future features or functionality described for our products remains at our sole discretion.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 30, 2013

    The complexity is due to the fact it is a change of behaviour, could effect existing users and such a change in behaviour needs to come a release boundary.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 30, 2013

    This RFE is being reopened because the issue is too complex to be addressed via a current release apar and after all will have to be considered as a requirement and considered as a candidate for a future release.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 15, 2013

    This RFE is being closed because the issue raised has been identified as a defect. Apar PM86905 has been opened to address this problem.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 11, 2013

    Feedback and trace information received from customer.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 4, 2013

    To be sure whats going on here, would it be possible to send an aux trace of the STARTed transaction that issues the DPL requests? Please send to gburgess@uk.ibm.com

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 27, 2013

    Hello,

    Here is a BAS dump of our transaction in question:

    DEFVER(1)
    NAME(WBS1)
    ALIAS( )
    PROGRAM(DFHMIRS)
    REMOTENAME( )
    REMOTESYSTEM( )
    PROFILE(DFHCICST)
    FAILACTION(BACKOUT)
    INDOUBT(BACKOUT)
    CMDSEC(NO)
    SHUTDOWN(DISABLED)
    STATUS(ENABLED)
    TASKDATAKEY(USER)
    TASKDATALOC(ANY)
    TASKREQ( )
    LOCALQ(N_A)
    RESSEC(NO)
    STORAGECLEAR(NO)
    RESTART(NO)
    SPURGE(YES)
    TPURGE(NO)
    WAIT(YES)
    TRACE(YES)
    TRPROF( )
    TRANCLASS(WBS1TCLS)
    TCLASS( )
    TWASIZE( 0)
    PARTITIONSET( )
    XTRANID( )
    ISOLATE(YES)
    DUMP(YES)
    DYNAMIC(NO)
    PRIORITY( 1)
    RUNAWAY(SYSTEM)
    DTIMOUT( 205)
    WAITTIMEDD( 0)
    WAITTIMEHH( 0)
    WAITTIMEMM( 0)
    TPNAME( )
    XTPNAME( )
    TRANSEC( )
    PRIMEDSIZE( )
    EXTSEC(N_A)
    SECURE(YES)
    USEALTSCRSIZ(NO)
    RSLC(NO)
    RSL( )
    CONFDATA(NO)
    CREATETIME( )
    USERDATA1( )
    USERDATA2( )
    USERDATA3( )
    DESCRIPTION( )
    BREXIT( )
    ROUTABLE(NO)
    OTSTIMEOUT(NO)
    DESCCODEPAGE(37)
    CHANGEAGENT(N_A)
    CHANGEUSRID( )
    CHANGEAGREL( )
    CSDGROUP( )

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 26, 2013

    Please can you give details of how the initial Web service transaction is defined, ie shows us the transaction definition attributes.