Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Categories Toolkit
Created by Guest
Created on May 16, 2016

Provide SPM ITERATE-like analogue with conditions, similar to LEAVE/DOEXIT

An analogous macro to ITERATE with conditions, similar to DOEXIT & ASMLEAVE, would be very helpful to write more understandable code and take advantage of internal z Systems pipelining, instruction prefetch, and branch prediction.

(Note: I have personally been working on such a macro on my own, but I have not finished it yet. I am available for discussing what I've done so far.)

This would pair well with RFE 67135 with a replacement of the SPMs.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 22, 2021

    Although this item is a good suggestion, it provides only a minor benefit, and it is far from trivial to implement, test and document. Given internal priorities and resources, we are therefore unlikely to schedule it within the next year or so. We have been informed that according to IBM guidelines this means we should decline this RFE. We are however keeping this item on our internal list of suggested enhancements and may implement it eventually.

    From a technical point of view, we are thinking of allowing condition operands to be specified on both LEAVE and ITERATE, following the optional DO label, and it is not at all clear why DOEXIT was implemented separately, with a different syntax.

    Jonathan Scott, HLASM and Toolkit

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 28, 2020

    Perhaps DOAGAIN with similar syntax to DOEXIT might be the clearest name to use for this function. It appears reasonably simple to implement, as a conditional form of ITERATE.

    However, we are concerned that these macros have already evolved to a level of complexity that is effectively equivalent to a new language, but with syntax that doesn't integrate well with assembler source (especially continuation and indentation), and with closely related functions using different styles. For example, DOEXIT without operands is equivalent to ASMLEAVE but the naming scheme and syntax of these macros is quite different. We are therefore also looking at alternative ways to improve the structured programming capabilities, for example by the use of separate macros for additional conditions, rather than continuing to extend the current scheme, so although we are provisionally accepting this request as a candidate for future implementation, we may still choose to implement a different solution.

    Jonathan Scott, HLASM and Toolkit