Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Categories Assembler
Created by Guest
Created on May 24, 2013

Reduce Severity of error when macro call specifies option twice.

If an attempt is made to assemble assembler source that has a macro call with the same parameter specified twice the assembler will produce the following message:

** ASMA018S Duplicate keyword in macro call; last value is used - DFHSI/SUFFIX

(In this case I am assembling a CICS System Initialisation Table).

And gives a return code 12.

It seems a bit inconsistent to state that the last value specified will be used and then regard this as a severe error.

Searching the assembler messages for "duplicate" produces the following messages:

ASMA004E Duplicate SET symbol declaration; first is retained
ASMA048E ENTRY error - xxxxxxxx (quotes duplicate symbol as possible cause)
ASMA011E Inconsistent global declarations; first is retained
ASMA043E Previously defined symbol - xxxxxxxx

I've not done an exhaustive check but the general trend for duplicates is error (rc=8) not severe.

Personally, I'd prefer a warning (rc=4) for any messages that state which of the duplicate values are being used but as a minimum consider the message ASMA018 should be an error to be consistent with ASMA004.

(For completeness messages used are at: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/topic/com.ibm.zos.r12.asma100/asmp1020208.htm#wq682

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 5, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Enterprise Tooling
    Product - High Level Assembler (HLASM)

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - WebSphere
    Product family - Enterprise Tooling
    Product - High Level Assembler (HLASM)

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 21, 2014

    This RFE request has been delivered in APAR PI28368.
    Regards - HLASM Team @ Hursley

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 24, 2013

    It is not unreasonable to request the change of severity from 12 to 8 for this particular error - so that it is in line with problems of a similar nature.
    We accept this requirement as an uncommitted candidate.