Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Categories Client Install
Created by Guest
Created on May 11, 2011

The ability to override a property group needs to be available at the dataset level

Currently the ability to override a property group exists at the member level only. When setting up PDS's on the mainframe they are normally set up by project. As such any property group overrides necessary for one module in the PDS is normally necessary for all the modules in the PDS. It is logical then that the ability to override a propertry group be available at the dataset level.

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 11, 2021

    This was delivered in past releases.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 14, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Programming Languages
    Product - Developer for System z

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Rational
    Product family - Design & development
    Product - Developer for System z

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 25, 2011

    This RFE is consistent with our roadmap and is being cosidered for delivery in the next 2 year time frame. Thanks.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 21, 2011

    We have set up our property groups to match the concatinations that our Endevor system uses. But when programs are first being developed many times programmers will put copybooks and programs in thier own PDS's. To work around this you either override the property group for each program affected, or you have to copy the existing property group and create a new one with the test PDS added. It would be a nice option to be able to use the override property group at a higher level than the program level as a temporary change in the early part of a project, rather than creating additional propetry groups. We already have 26 property groups defined to support all our Endevor enviornments.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 6, 2011

    Can you please clarify the usecase that prompts you to change or override at member level. If all the source is in single PDS - and those are the ones being built, why can't the properties set at the sub project level be sufficient ? Thanks.