IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Not under consideration
Workspace IMS System Services
Categories System Management
Created by Guest
Created on Feb 12, 2013

RELATED IDEAS

Reject huge Web Service requests/responses in ICON

This requirement has been submitted as MR1220125727.

To prevent individual Web Service requests from blocking ICON instances they should be rejected by ICON. Instead, a SOAP Fault should be returned. This should be done for SOAP requests or PL/I responses that exceed a certain size that can be specified in a configuration parameter.

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 27, 2014

    Dear Ms Conzett,

    Thank you for submitting this IMS enhancement request.

    After a comprehensive review, we regret to inform you that we have determined that at this time this request will not be a candidate for inclusion in an upcoming release because it is not consistent with the product direction.  Hence, we have rejected this request.

    We appreciate your input to the IMS development team.

    Sincerely,
    Tom Morrison

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 27, 2014

    This RFE requirement will be rejected, as requested by Derek Griffiths at Credit Suisse.
    The following was sent by email from Derek Griffiths at Credit Suisse on 03/06/2014:

    I spoke to my people about this and the general opinion is that we are currently not in a position to clearly specify how this requirement should look and as such there’s seems little point in pursuing it at this point in time. If we should need it at a future date we will create a new RFE. 31179 should be closed.

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.