Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Dec 19, 2017

Possibility to remove MTO LTERM

When SA IMS automation is implemented there will be no Netview TAF-terminal dequeueing the messages from the MTO LTERM.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 6, 2018

    Hi Rolf,

    Thank you for your interest in keeping IMS a vital and successful product. Software development has continuously evolved during IMS's lifetime, and so has IMS itself. We have kept pace with, adopted, and implemented many industry standard best practices within our organization, including Continuous Delivery, Design Thinking, and Agile.

    When choosing new features to add from the list of requirements in our backlog, we assess which will bring the most value to as many clients as possible and prioritize those.

    At this time, after reviewing this request for enhancement and assessing its potential value, we have decided to reject it. The reason we are rejecting this RFE is due to higher priority items preventing us from delivering this within 18 months.You are welcome to resubmit this RFE at a later date and we will reconsider.

    We appreciate your input to IMS, and we hope that you will continue to submit ideas for improvements as customer feedback is a key component to shaping the future direction of IMS.

    Thank you.

    Sincerely
    Swetha Sridharan
    swetha.sridharan@ibm.com

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 10, 2018

    Hi Rolf,

    Thank you for your interest in keeping IMS a vital and successful product. Software development has continuously evolved during IMS's lifetime, and so has IMS itself. We have kept pace with, adopted, and implemented many industry standard best practices within our organization, including Continuous Delivery, Design Thinking, and Agile.

    When choosing new features to add from the list of requirements in our backlog, we assess which will bring the most value to as many clients as possible and prioritize those.

    After reviewing this request for enhancement and assessing its potential value, our decision is to add this item to our backlog. Items in our backlog are expected to be delivered within the next 18 months. We reserve the right to re-prioritize our backlog items as new requests come in. This helps ensure that we are constantly focused on providing the best value to all of our clients.


    Have a great day!
    Deepak Kohli – deepakk@us.ibm.com

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 10, 2018

    Thanks for getting back to us Rolf. We'll evaluate & get back to you.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 10, 2018

    Hi,
    I got suggestions from Deepak Kohli for this RFE that we e.g could use the command /[Deleted] LTERM MASTER TO LINE 1 PTERM 1 to assign the master terminal to the MVS console. But we're not satisfied that we have to set up an automated process to enter replies to WTOR on a regular basis.
    We have not yet tried the first suggerstion to define the master terminal with OPTIONS=UNPROT in the TERMINAL macro.

    We would appreciate if it was possible to be able to assign the master terminal to a dummy device like a spool line by bypassing the code test that checks if the device is a master terminal.

    Best Regards,
    Rolf Ullberg