This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
delivered as part of the 5.1 version
since we have had no response to our questions, we are going to assume that providing a new built-in function that would return this timestamp value would satisfy this requirement. If something else is wanted, a new requirement should be opened
Following up on the update from October 19, 2015:
We have implemented a TIMESTAMP built-in function in October 2015. Does this provide what you are looking for?
does the recently provided TIMESTAMP built-in function provide what you are looking for here?
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Programming Languages
Product - PL/I Compilers
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Rational
Product family - Design & development
Product - PL/I Compilers
sorry - I missed the earlier comments about this - so, the enhancement you want is the ability to get the nanoseconds as part of a date-time string, correct?
Could you provide some more details on what additional date-time information you would like from PL/I that is currently provided by DB2? Thanks
providing nanoseconds in the time stamp is a possible candidate for a future release
This is not a DATETIME but a request for TIMESTAMP.
The PL/I DATETIME returns 'YYYYMMDDHHMISS999' but a DB2 TIMESTAMP is 'YYYYMMDDHHMISS999999'.
what date-time information is wanted that is not provided by the DATETIME() built-in function?