Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Workspace PL/I Compilers
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 21, 2016

Inline/internal %INCLUDE

When the same structure is used multiple times in a program, it's easy to declare it once in full and reuse it in other structures declared with LIKE. When used this way, any change to the "base" structure" will automagically be applied to all its derivatives.

It would be if a similar feature was available for short snippets of code. Obviously, there is the long standing option to create %INCLUDE members with the required few lines of code, and include these multiple times, but when used for short snippets, using %INCLUDE has two (minor) disadvantages:

1) The programmer has to access another dataset to actually see and/or modify the code
2) Using %INCLUDE members that are used in one single program doesn't really make sense from a point of reusability.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 27, 2016

    there are already several ways to accomplish this and adding a new one would add unneeded clutter to the language

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 19, 2016

    Horrible indeed, woecki.

    Prino should read the manual and learn how to use a procedure.

    It's funny this guy complains about suggestions that will actually improve productivity for all users of the compiler, but then suggests this nonsense the compiler can already handle properly via a procedure, functionality which has been in the compiler for the 25+ years I've been using it.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 19, 2016

    create a proc and rely on the compilers ability to inline (no idea how well this is done currently).
    code multiplication prior to compilation sounds like a really horrible idea to me, sorry.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 28, 2016

    This is a bad idea, not well thought out, and unnecessary. Use a Proc and let the compiler sort it out.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 24, 2016

    Under consideration