This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
This is not requesting that Python stop being an executable source code scripting language. This is about providing a byte code only alternative while still retaining the existing ability to execute from source code for those who want the least privilege additional security in production contexts. The UNIX shell and JAVA have this same problem. For the UNIX shell a potential remedy is to restrict authorization regarding who can execute it and to avoid shell scrips for in-house production applications. For JAVA, the best solution is the same as for Python, which is to provide an ability to optionally install the interpreter without the source code execution functionality or to provide an alternative byte code only interpreter in addition to the source code capable interpreter and to allow one of the two interpreters to be selected during the install.
Python is fundamentally an interpreter. It’s the same problem for other languages - java, shell, etc. Making the Python interpreter byte code only does not improve the security.
Is there any further consideration to make Python byte code only?