Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Nov 26, 2014

Différence de version du générateur dans RPP

Ano-V9.1-28 ? Version du g?n?rateur dans RPP
A la g?n?ration d'un nouveau programme COBOL la version indiqu?e du logiciel est diff?rente de celle de migration (le probl?me est le m?me ? la re-g?n?ration d'un programme migr?)
Est-ce normal ? Nous pensions que le g?n?rateur ?tait le m?me entre la migration et l'interface RPP

Commentaires IBM du 31/10/2014
Le g?n?rateur est le m?me pour la migration et le client Eclipse.
Il ne s'agit pas de la version du g?n?rateur ni des squelettes mais d'une information issue des libell?s d'erreur.
IBM reconna?t que les informations devraient ?tre similaires dans les 2 cas.
En revanche, IBM se demande s'il est judicieux de continuer ? positionner un num?ro de session (9999), alors que la g?n?ration est r?alis?e avec RPP.
IBM vous propose de cr?er une "Request For Enhancement" (probl?me non bloquant)

Idea priority Low
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 14, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Development Tooling
    Product - Programming Patterns

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Rational
    Product family - Design & development
    Product - Programming Patterns

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 2, 2014

    We have evaluated this request and determined that it cannot be implemented at this time because the Pacbase version has no sense in RPP.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 26, 2014

    Attachment (Description)