Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Sep 25, 2015

Absence d'indentation représentant la hiérarchie des bibliothéques

Lorsque l'on affiche les bibliotheques, on peut faire le choix de trier par niveau etc .... Par contre on ne voit pas de mani?re 'habituelle' l'indentation des biblioth?ques. Celle-ci est accessible mais dans les propri?t?s du r?f?rentiel RPP.

Am?lioration souhait?e de l'outil : pouvoir faire un choix d'affichage 'avec indentation' sur l'explorateur de design repr?sentant la hi?rarchie des biblioth?ques.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 20, 2020

    We have evaluated this request and determined that it cannot be implemented at this time .

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 16, 2016

    Although the theme of this request is consistent with our business strategy, it is not committed to the release that is currently under development.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 22, 2016

    Temporarily switched from "Planned for Future Release" to "Under Consideration" for planification meeting purpose.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 13, 2015

    The feature that is described in this request is a candidate for a future release.