Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on May 20, 2014

Am?liorer l'ergonomie des ?diteurs de type "tabulaire"

les ?diteurs de type "tabulaire" ne sont pas toujours pratiques et "intuitifs" surtout lorsqu'ils sont relativement complexes (P -CD, O -CE?).
Editeur P -CP : afficher les param?tres sur la panel gauche (liste des macros) sur une 2i?me ligne et non ? la suite de la ligne sinon on ne visualise pas les valeurs de param?tres si on ne passe pas en "plein ?cran" (et encore faut-il avoir un grand ?cran).
Editeur P -CD : mode multi-lignes peu pratique, mode "d?taill?" (partie inf?rieure) difficile ? utiliser sur un ?cran trop petit (20 pouces). Pourquoi ne pas proposer un ?diteur en partie graphique comme dans PacBench/Workbench ? (cf. http://www.guepard.asso.fr/tutoriel/vapimg/pcdben.png, http://www.guepard.asso.fr/tutoriel/vapimg/pcdwrk.png).
Editeur R -CE, R -D : m?me remarques que P -CD pour ce qui concerne la saisie.
Editeur R -L : les modifications faites sur un ?diteur (haut multi-lignes, bas mono-ligne) ne sont pas imm?diatement r?percut?es sur l'autre ?dieur. La pr?sence de 2 ?diteurs est-elle n?cessaires ?
Editeur O -CE, O -CS : m?me remarque que P -CD.
Etc... Il faudrait faire une revue d?taill?e de chaque ?diteur.
Lors de la r?f?rence ? une autre entit? (appel d'une Rubrique dans un Segment, appel d'un Format Guide dans un -G), le produit ne propose au mieux que les entit?s pr?sentes en local, il faudrait proposer via un syst?me de type filtrage/autocompl?tion, les entit?s d?finies en local mais aussi sur serveur, dans le scope de la hi?rarchie des components (par rapport au compoent de l'entit? en cours d'?dition).

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 30, 2020

    We have evaluated this request and determined that it cannot be implemented at this time.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 8, 2016

    Although the theme of this request is consistent with our business strategy, it is not committed to the release that is currently under development.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 14, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Development Tooling
    Product - Programming Patterns

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Rational
    Product family - Design & development
    Product - Programming Patterns

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 23, 2014

    This RFE's Headline was changed after submission to reflect the headline of an internal request we were already considering, but will now track here.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 23, 2014

    The feature that is described in this request is a candidate for a future release.