Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Categories z/TPF
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 7, 2017

CCSONP - NO DISPENSE IF MOD PAIR (or Mod) TOO BUSY

It's been years since “ALL” TPF MOD PAIRs (P&D) have produced the same performance and this disparity is getting worse with FICON; due to multiple device activity per channel, hundreds of devices per frame, tens of channels per CPU and tens of CPUs, each CPU having awesome speed - Every mod pair works differently.
Mod pair and Device overload is / has become common: To some manageable; causing others to add their own reducing agents, while others just wait.

When “OVERLOAD HITS”- it's often too late and just like sharks at feeding time – so too is the reaction; some vague decreasing / delaying agent is added; Thus making TPF's speed slower.

Isn't “SLOWING TPF” the worst thing one can do?

What's helpful is a SIP selectable option in which users avoid OVERLOAD to purchase reaction time.

This SIP option is:

STOP dispensing NEW POOL to a STRESSED OUT mod of a pair.

Look for and use non-stressed Pairs.

Maintain TPFs speed as long as possible, when possible.

The number of mods used by TPF will grow and growth is good for TPF – growth should be more speed.


Mod Pairs that “do more” should get more.

The pairs who do less:

These need to avoid catastrophic processing, away to do that is to remove Pool Dispensing.

No dispense drops IO activity by more than 40%.

The slow mods have an easier time of staying even until a fix is added.

Thus allowing TPF to maintain speed.

later - Lovely monitoring and managing tools can be added.


CCSONP already has no pool dispense for MOD down - this processing can be expanded to include STRESS conditions, like:

High Mod Queue,
Mod Copy,
Mod Capture,
Mod Mount / Dismount,
CC3 processing,
Path down & Errors,
etc.

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 8, 2017

    IBM does not intend to do this in the foreseeable future.