IBM Z Software
This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
@Guest did you see Hans' response above?
Hi Steve, have you seen the response above from Hans?
That sounds like you want to be sure the relevant configuration assertions are also present, and not just the DEFSENS? That could currently be achieved by a NEWLIST TYPE=RESOURCE and NEWLIST TYPE=SENSDSN summarizing the PRIV_SENSTYPE field. And also, SCKRCARL member CKALSTDC shows the configuration assertions used in a AU.R.E submitted batch compliance run.
Yes, I did. The issue is that our auditors want to see evidence that all our site-defined sensitivity types are being taken into consideration for newlist type=trusted. As the newlist only reports on sensitivity types that have corresponding access entitlements, our auditors want to be assured that they have been taken into consideration, and that the definitions have not been somehow bypassed/removed/dropped from zSecure. Seems like a reasonable request to me.
Did you have a look at IN.S ? That is supposed to be updated with the product maintenance.