This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
This requirement is addressed by z/OS Connect Enterprise Edition V3.0.45 / APAR PH36068:
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/PH36068
The z/OS Connect EE API requester is enhanced to allow you to specify the idAssertion attribute on the
zosconnect_apiRequesters > apiRequester subelement for individual API requesters.
For further details refer to the “additional configuration for the API requester archive” topic in the z/OS Connect EE V3.0 Documentation:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zosconnect/3.0?topic=reference-configuration-elements#config_elements__apiRequester
Strikes me that in an Operational Envt its vital that any setting for ID Assertion is consistent across all requestors (and in effect active). So on that basis I'm not supportive of this RFE.