Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Workspace GDPS
Created by Guest
Created on May 4, 2021

Provide facility to recover a subset of LCP (Safeguard) volumes

Currently LCP (Logical Corruption Protection) "recovery sets" are managed as a single entity collection of volumes and the recovery process handles them as a complete set. This enhancement would allow definition of a subset of the full recovery set to be defined and used for recovery of fewer volumes than the complete set.

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 22, 2024
    .After giving the request a comprehensive review, we have determined that we cannot include it as a candidate in an upcoming release because it won?t be pursued within our planning cycle.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 2, 2021

    N/A

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 1, 2021

    N/A

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 30, 2021

    Any additional validation options for LCP copies is welcome to us

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 25, 2021

    Would enable faster validation. i.e If you know where the corruption is but don't know when it happened. Restoring single volumes would allow faster identification of how far back you may need to go, without having to do full restorations each time.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 24, 2021

    I voted for this, but I feel it has a very limited use case.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 24, 2021

    Same as LBG.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 16, 2021

    This requirement is not applicable to LBG within the next two years as we don't have LCP and no firm plans to implement at this stage.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 5, 2021

    Fine suggestion.
    This method would also bring the benefit that we could validate on subset of volumes(from 1 to more) before doing the full recovery.
    Meaning a test option. I like the idea.
    I guess rename of volser is not an option when doing LCP recover, but that would as well bring us an option to get a 'shadow volume' available on original system without bringing up the entire Recovery sysplex 'just for validations'?