This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
A must have, high priority to fix this design failure based on device level. Next step would be having virtual capacity grouped by consistentie group (or perhaps not at all)
The architecture design having the customer to decide the SGC multiplier MUST be changed by IBM.
I cannot see it makes sense that every installation have to handle that manually. Especially not when we are expected to have intact and restartable "backups"
Agree - high priority
Must have… You don't want to lose a capture. Beter to check afterwards why more capacity was needed than expected.
I created similar 'case' where I have many people voting for it.
There is a need to get this functionality automated.
Agree this would be helpful, dynamic virtual capacity with increased monitoring is what we want
Any, I mean any, enhancements to decrease a capture failure is very welcome.
I agree with this requirement - we should not have to second guess how big our SGC backup volumes will be and we should definitely not need to manually increase the multiplier for individual hot volumes. The solution should take this decision out of our hands.