This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Hi, thank you for your RFE suggestion.
The team wanted to clarify the following details :
What is the exact PDS member is identified by name or ordering index (integer)?
With both exact PDS member (by name or integer index) and range query provided (by start range name or start index), should the return be inline with both conditions?
For example: PDS has member 'B' (index 2), for the exact filter name 'B' with memberAttrs query if:
start range name is 'C', or start index is 3, it will return nothing.
start range name is 'A', or start index is 1, it will return the member 'B' attributes.
Should the caller expect to have the index (integer) of the member returned in the response header?