Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Workspace COBOL Compilers
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 19, 2016

Increase COBOL Technical Resources for Publication Development

IBM should allocate significantly more/better COBOL technical resources for the preparation and review of their publications.

IBM dedicated many person hours (years) to the development of the software for Enterprise COBOL V5.1. However, it appears that minimal (certainly not comparable) resources were allocated to the development and review of the technical publications that accompanied this release.

Errors in the publication set vary from:
Humorous (such as referencing to the 16G line or telling people to send their RCF's to the wrong email address)
or
Anarchistic (such as references to a CICS Macro Migration tool that is no longer available or talking about year 2000 as in the future)
or
More serious misleading information (such as stating that CBLQDA(ON) is required when it isn't or referencing the wrong release and edition number for the Customization Guide within the Program Directory)

In general, COBOL users can open the COBOL publications almost at random and find an error (some serious, some not) within a few pages.

These types of errors (and the problems that they cause users) can only be avoided with SIGNIFICANT technical COBOL resources (more than has happened in the recent past) being allocated during the development and review of the COBOL publication set.

Idea priority Low
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 10, 2020

    We acknowledge that complete and accurate documentation reviews are essential and therefore put more attention on documentation reviews and updates for our Enterprise COBOL V6.2 and V6.3 GA releases, and will continue to do so for future releases as well. We also address new comments received via Case reports or written in comments and comments and refresh documentation (both KC and downloadable PDFs) on a monthly basis.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 7, 2016

    Moving this RFE to 'uncommitted candidate' . It will be updated once put into plan.