This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
The request is precisely to make the >>evaluate directive behave like the evaluate instruction.
The ISO standard is not very precise on this point, and even so, there are already implementations in the IBM compiler which do not follow the ISO standard (see the EXIT instruction).
Without this change, the use of the >>evaluate directive is made complicated (or even unusable) due to the limitation to 1 line to express the condition of each >>when
Based on the Standard, the >>WHEN conditions of the >>EVALUATE directive is actually different than the WHEN conditions of the EVALUATE instruction. The RFE is not part of the Standard and as a result is being rejected.
Hi Rune
Statement Evaluate / When run this way.
But directive >>Evaluate / >>When does not.
Hi Dennis,
I do not understand this request.
COBOL should allready be working like this.
I did a unit test, with the two different evaluate structures, and they both act in the same way.
Could you clarify the issue, as I am uncertain of the problem.
Thanks
Regards,
Rune
Attachment (Description): Expected implementation
Attachment (Description): Current implementation