IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Delivered
Workspace COBOL Compilers
Categories z/OS
Created by Guest
Created on Nov 2, 2022

RELATED IDEAS

Feature Request - JSON PARSE - [" was found, but one of LEFT CURLY BRACKET was expected

It is possible in the JSON standard for a top-level JSON to have an array, e.g. [{..}, {..}]. However, this cannot be read with the current JSON parse, instead you have to build an object around it with string processing so that you can parse it. If it were then possible, you could specify a group structure for into and mark it as suppressed with "name group structure is omitted".


PDF Case number...
PDF Case number TS010652140.pdf
 PDF Case number TS010652140.pdf
Open full size
PDF Case number TS010652140.pdf
Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Feb 6, 2024

    Hi Basil,
    Many thanks. I already forwarded the great news with the team and we will implement the APARs as soon as possible. Thanks and have a nice day.


    Regards,

    Eduardo Carrara.

  • Admin
    Basil Kanneth
    Reply
    |     Feb 2, 2024

    This feature was delivered in the 202312 V6.4 PTF under APAR PH58384 and 202312 COBOL RTE PTF under APAR PH58391

  • Admin
    Basil Kanneth
    Reply
    |     Jan 31, 2023

    This Idea is being accepted and put into our backlog. It will be updated again once put into plan.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Dec 5, 2022

    Great, thanks. Let me know if you need some more information :-)

    Regards, Eduardo

  • Admin
    Basil Kanneth
    Reply
    |     Dec 2, 2022

    This Idea is still being investigated further.

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.