This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
This request is being accepted. It will be updated once put into plan.
Hi,
No, no application porting project, but "who knows"...
It is more a position of principle which is to be as independent as possible from a specific implementation of a manufacturer. In the same way that we favor "binary" instead of "comp" or "comp-4", "packed-decimal" instead of "comp-3", we would like to use declarations provided a priori in the COBOL standard for the "comp-5" declarations.
In the same way that we favor "binary" instead of "comp" or "comp-4", "packed-decimal" instead of "comp-3", we would like to use declarations (provided a priori in the COBOL standard) for "comp-5" declarations.
There will remain the case of "comp-1" and "comp-2", and "display-1" for which I do not know if there is a correspondence in a standard declaration not linked to a constructor implementation, but the use cases of these formats remain the exception.
Thanks.
Hi Denis, in regards to portability, may we know if you are looking to port an application onto our COBOL product? and if so, how are things defined right now?