Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Categories Client Install
Created by Guest
Created on Jan 9, 2012

New Assembler Macro feature implemented in RDz V8.0.3 does not work well in large shops

Description:
The new real-time syntax check feature for assembler macros implemented in RDz 8.0.3 is unworkable in large shops. On just one plex (we have 9) we have 7 different applications that use different PDS libraries. Each application has from three to six levels of libraries going from test to production. We have set up workspaces for each plex and have property groups defined in the workspace to identify each application and test level. We have 700+ people who work on these systems. Here are the issues with the way this assembler process is structured:

1. If we don't want to use this feature then there should be a way to use a more basic version. There is a place to define the macro files in the Property group. If the user file is not set up then the process should look at that library list to see if the macro exists in any of those files and only flag it as an error if it is not found. This is what is done for COBOL copybooks and it should work the same here.

2. The user XML macro file is defined at the Workspace Level, not at the property group level. Our macros are not named the same between the applications. Using this process we would need to define a workspace for each application and each test level. If you are going to use this process then the file definition should be at the property group level, not the workspace level.

3. There is no supplied process to read the macro library to build the XML file. This means that the entire process is manual. There should be a supplied routine that will read the mainframe macro PDS and build the initial XML file. It could then be updated manually to add any comments and descriptions.

4. With a large shop and without some automated process and a large number of programmers it will be very difficult to monitor and update the XML file when new macros are created.

Idea priority Urgent
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 14, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Programming Languages
    Product - Developer for System z

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Rational
    Product family - Design & development
    Product - Developer for System z

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 25, 2012

    Delivered with RDz 8.5

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 16, 2012

    This RFE is consistent with our roadmap and is being considered for delivery in the next 2 year time frame. Thanks.