Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on May 28, 2018

Create/update DVSVC000 at IMS control region start

IMS should create the DFSVC000 member at a cold start.
or
IMS should override the IMS ID from the Sysgen process in the DFSVC000 member with the IMSID provided in the DFSPBxxx member at a cold start.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 11, 2018

    Hi Daniel,

    Thank you for your interest in keeping IMS a vital and successful product. Software development has continuously evolved during IMS's lifetime, and so has IMS itself. We have kept pace with, adopted, and implemented many industry standard best practices within our organization, including Continuous Delivery, Design Thinking, and Agile.

    When choosing new features to add from the list of requirements in our backlog, we assess which will bring the most value to as many clients as possible and prioritize those.

    At this time, after reviewing this request for enhancement and assessing its potential value, we have decided to reject it. The reason we are rejecting RFE due to higher priority items preventing us from delivering RFEs within 18 months.You are welcome to resubmit this RFE at a later date and we will reconsider.

    We appreciate your input to IMS, and we hope that you will continue to submit ideas for improvements as customer feedback is a key component to shaping the future direction of IMS.

    Thank you.

    Sincerely
    Swetha Sridharan
    swetha.sridharan@ibm.com

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 5, 2018

    Hi Daniel,

    I'm circling back to see if this alternative specified seems reasonable to you? Could you please get back to us on this?

    Thank You.

    Best,
    Swetha Sridharan
    swetha.sridharan@ibm.com

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 2, 2018

    Hi Daniel,

    Sorry about the confusion there.

    The IMSID can be specified as an override in the DFSPBxxx proclib member or JCL override.
    Is this override a reasonable alternative to you?
    We assume that this is not a reasonable alternative which is why the RFE was opened, perhaps because it would require too many JCL changes in your environment.
    If that is the case, and the IMSID is the only issue, then we are looking into alternative ways that the IMSID can be specified, perhaps similar to the SVC specifications in DFSIDEF0 introduced in IMS Version 15.

    Please let us know.

    Thank You.

    Best,
    Swetha Sridharan
    swetha.sridharan@ibm.com

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 25, 2018

    Hi Swetha,

    yes ist is.
    Can you please explain 'where the JCL override is not a reasonable alternative?'?

    Regards,
    Daniel Hirschler

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 10, 2018

    Hi Daniel,

    We are reviewing your RFE 99056 and we have following question:
    Is the current need to be able to specify the IMS ID override for dependent regions, batch and utility,
    where the JCL override is not a reasonable alternative?
    Please let us know

    Thank You.
    Best,
    Swetha Sridharan
    swetha.sridharan@ibm.com