This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Whilst this requirement is valid, based on our current plans and priorities for IBM z/OS Connect Enterprise Edition, it is not likely that this could be implemented in the next 12 months. Correspondingly this requirement is being declined at this point. The requirement will be kept in the RFE system and might be reassessed in the future. You also have an opportunity to resubmit in twelve months time if you wish it to be reconsidered then.
z/OS Connect should provide method level security like a regular JavaEE application i.e. you can setup the in web.xml to control the method level access (e.g. a regular user can GET but only administrator can PUT).
The question of whether API authorization is to be decoupled from service authorization is dependent on how APIs and services will be coupled more generally in the future. Because this coupling exists at the deployment level I assumed that it would apply at the authorization level. If security for APIs and services is to be decoupled, then I think that API authorization needs to be provided at the operation level i.e HTTP method/URI combination. This would be consistent with API Connect.
If there was method-level granularity for security of APIs, would that be sufficient to achieve the desired result? e.g. the ability to allow user X to invoke API Y method GET but not method POST ? These would operate independently of the service definitions and their security profiles.