Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Workspace z/OS Connect
Created by Guest
Created on May 4, 2020

Enhance Comms Stub to segment Data for CICS API Requestor services

The currently CALL interface in the zos Communication Stub is too rudimentary in nature and fails to take into account large and complex data structures now prevalent in many common external API's.

This constraint is a major blocker for effective exploitation in the API requestor element of the zos Connect EE product.

In effect Unbounded Arrays, combined with large data structures and optional data in SWAGGER file definitions result in bloated COBOL (and PL1) data structures. In some cases a JSON payload of 7k or 9k requires COBOL data structures of 10's of MB ! In turn these means that excessive EUDSA is allocated and in effect zos Connect EE delivers a solution which functionally may just work but from a non-functional perspective is deficient.

The remedy has to be to enhance the Comms Stub to deliver for CICS applications data segmented into separate CICS containers.

So deliver optional data into separate arrays with mandatory data placed into a specified container, e.g. DFHZOSCE-REQUEST / DFHZOSCE-RESPONSE.

Again this will allow CICS applications to allocate space and read / create data in a selective manner – and able to manage the EUDSA required.

Where data is already part of an UnBounded Array then place mandatory elements into numbered occurrences, e.g. DFHZOSCE-REQUEST-nn / DFHZOSCE-RESPONSE-nn.

Allow for Unbounded Arrays within Optional Data – and vica versa up to an agreed limit (suggest three for a starter). In order to allow for a considerable number of data structures in the ZCONBT tool generate separate directories for each service.

Idea priority High
  • Admin
    Demelza Farrer
    Reply
    |
    Jan 25, 2023

    This requirement is addressed by z/OS Connect V3.0.65 / APAR PH51617:
    https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/PH51617
    For further details about specifying the size limit for an array using 'inlineMaxOccursLimit' property, refer to the “The API requester Gradle plug-in properties and options” topic
    in the z/OS Connect (OpenAPI 3) Documentation:
    https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos-connect/zos-connect/3.0?topic=requester-gradle-plug-in-properties-options

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 31, 2020

    Thank you for this RFE,

    As we progress the development of API requester we intend to look at supporting the more complex JSON schemas that are possible in OpenAPI 3.0 specifications and enhance how these map to copybook structures to provide more efficient data transport. Due to the complexities involved it is not likely that this could be delivered the near term. For this reason we would usually decline this RFE at this time to indicate that delivery was not likely to be delivered in the near future.

    However, since this capability is central to our strategy, we have made an exception in this case to accept this RFE into uncommitted candidate.

    At this stage we are exploring early design concepts and would ask anyone interested in this RFE to sign up to the z/OS Connect EE design partnership here:
    https://www-01.ibm.com/marketing/iwm/iwmdocs/web/cc/earlyprograms/zcustomer.shtml
    To help shape the delivery of this capability.