Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Workspace GDPS
Created by Guest
Created on May 27, 2024

Health Check about IC Definitions

We simulated a Site1-Outage in the Production but loose all Images sysplexwide (except the Master KSYS). IBM told us in the Case that we use not the newest Inital Clists (IC) for the Operators. 
It would be very helpful if a GDPS Health Check can check this Definitions.

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 14, 2025

    Makes sense to us to show that as a healthcheck.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 2, 2025

    Sounds reasonable

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 19, 2024

    The impact is high so agree with putting in health check. Medium priority.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 19, 2024

    sounds good to us

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 19, 2024

    Voted and agree. Healtchecks are very useful!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 17, 2024

    Sounds reasonable. I suppose when there is a messy, over-complicated process in place that is required to run the software, (like using and managing 100s of auto operators), we can either a) write warnings and healthchecks to alert us when the messy and overly complicated processes have not been correctly implemented, or b) we could simplify the way it works.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 12, 2024

    Added health checks are important.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 12, 2024

    I may not understand fully, but this sounds like an software deployment issue. If a HC can verify that all systems have the correct levels, that would be great. If the deployment process is sound, this would be a low priority.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 12, 2024

    If a health check can prevent an outage, by default it should be created.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 12, 2024

    There are / can be many HC's for "things we might have missed". Too many to implement them all.
    But looking at the impact (loose all Images sysplexwide), we voted for this.
    Just a typo (using O or 0) can already be a disaster. Please have a HC give a heads up before instead of sysplex wide down situation after the fact.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 12, 2024

    Voted and agree. Healtchecks are very useful!

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 12, 2024

    Additional Health Checks can be useful for determining where configuration items have not been properly done.