Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jan 7, 2022

Make it clear what resources are in-scope of a user issues a stop request name/SYG/name

User inadvertently issued a stop against the system resource name/SYG/name APG.

This obviously resulted in Automation shutting the system down, but this was not what the user intended!

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 25, 2022

    Hi. That's fine, but was something I was trying to avoid. I will pursue this option.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 14, 2022

    Have you had chance to consider our idea to write an Exit? See the comment from Jan. 20th below.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 20, 2022

    Thank you for submitting this request for enhancement. We have discussed internally a "What-If" utility - however came to the point that this cannot be accurate in an case.
    In addition, we have a growing number of interfaces, INGREQ is only one of it. In addition we have SMU as dasboard solution, we added the SA Operations REST API, Ansible playbooks and last not least
    the SA Plug-in for Zowe CLI - Ansible and CLI make use of the SA Operations API.
    So, all these interfaces would require a "what-if" mode to be sure.

    What do you think about writing an own EXIT that warns te user to issue requests against a SYG? This exit would also warn the user in the other cases.