Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Categories Editors
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 15, 2022

COBOL Editor ignores Propertygroup

I have COBOL code in a file on a remote system and the exact same code in a local file. When I open the remote file the propertygroup (and especially the preprocessor extension) is used, when I open the local file it is not.

The features of the editor should depend on the content and not the location of the file. So I think this is an error. But in the case I was asked to open this idea.

To recreate:

  • Install a preprocessor extension into IDz

  • Create a remote and a local propertygroup that uses this extension

  • Create a remote file with some code and copy this file to a local location

  • Assign the remote propertygrop to the remote file and open it
    --> you can run the preprocessor from the menu

  • Try to assign the local property group to the local file
    --> I was not able to

  • Open the local file and try to run the preprocessor extention
    --> I was not able to

The use of a local z/OS project is not an option and we do not use remote z/OS projects either.

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 18, 2022
    Thank you for taking the time to suggest an enhancement to our product. Many of our product enhancements result from feedback from our customers, so your input is always very important to us. At this time we have no plans to address this request within the next two years, please feel free to resubmit in the next year or so for our consideration. Again, thank you for your suggestion and continued support.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 26, 2022

    The only reasonable project would be a project including all our files and ressources and programms. There is no point in our shop to distinguish between different projects since they all would have the same settings. That is why we use propertygroups for all our settings and connect them to remote files.

    Due to some development and more plugins we now have local files with cobol code in them and would like to use them wit the cobol editor. But without some local property gruops that is not possible. That difference is why I still think it is an error.

    1) remote file - project --> propertygroup working
    2) remote file - no project --> propertygroup working
    3) local file - project --> propertygroup working
    4) local file - no project --> this idea (error) exists to get this working too.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 26, 2022
    Thank you for submitting an idea to IDz. During our review we agreed more information would be beneficial to understand your scenario. It is unclear to why local or remote z/os projects are not used.