This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Programming Languages
Product - Business Developer
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Rational
Product family - Design & development
Product - Business Developer
Hello EGL-developer,
we are IBM partner and developing Migration tools from RPG and Cobol to EGL. During our work with EGL and application modernization we are also missing strongly the Cobol level-88 construct within EGL.
We also think it would be much more comfortable to have this functionality as part of the EGL language basics instead of maintaining own library parts for it. Also it would be much easier to convince experienced mainfraim programmers to work with EGL if they could find as many familiarities from good old Cobol within EGL.
As this RFE was rejected by IBM, should I include a new RFE with this topic?
kind regards
Andreas Gronert
While the suggested enhancement might be more elegant, the equivalent functionality can be coded currently with EGL. It therefore does not have high business value, and is unlikely to have high enough priority to be included a near-term release.