This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
While running an auxiliary trace to capture data to assist Threadsafe analysis for a transaction that typically performs some 30000-40000 DB2 calls we saw very high levels of IO that appeared to elongate the response times of the transaction fifty fold and eventually triggered a series of events that caused the region in which the transaction was running to become unresponsive.
1. IBM believe we may have reached an architectural limit, which would seem to be imposed by the the extremely old BSAM Access Method underpinning the CICS auxiliary trace utility. Could this be redesined to use a Logstream that would better serve tracing in today's CICS regions that can service up to 2000 tasks and around 4000 Open TCBs -- at CICS TS 5.1?
2. It would also be extremely useful if CETR were made more granular by providing an additional option whereby a single instance of a transaction could be traced ie a single task. In a region exploiting OTE many instances of a task can be captured very quickly causing large volumes of trace data to be recorded before the trace can be stopped.
Idea priority | High |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
We have assessed this requirement. We have no current plans for this to be implemented and so this requirement is being declined at this point. The requirement will be kept in the RFE system and might be reassessed in the future. You also have an opportunity to resubmit in twelve months time if you wish it to be reconsidered then.
Yes I have considered this. However, as the trace table is limited to 1 GIG, this will very quickly wrap. One trace where we captured just five instances of a single transactions tracing only 6 components, exceeded this in a couple of minutes. However, had these transactions been traced internally and assuming no increase in response time as seen in the auxiliary trace, they would have exceeded this limit in about ten seconds.
Also would be concerned about the effect of a one GIG trace table on the region's working set size. Have IBM any performance metrics on this aspect?
As an alternative to Aux Trace have you considered that because you have moved to CICS TS 5.1 from CICS TS V3, you can take advantage of an enhancement made in CICS TS 4.2, namely that the CICS internal trace table is above the bar. You can define a very large trace table, run the transactions take and then take a dump and print off the trace section. The overhead of internal trace is much less than aux trace..