This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Hi Mike, yes, you can use Allocate with CICS.
Basil, that works in batch, do you know if the COBOL Allocate verb is acceptable in CICS? I do not see it listed as restricted, but I always assumed we should use EXEC CICS GETMAIN?
Hi Renaud,
This idea has yet to be put into plan. We don't have an exact date yet.
However, in the meantime, we would like to propose a possible workaround:
If the only use case is for allocation, then using the form of ALLOCATE that allows you to specify the linkage section item directly in the ALLOCATE statement (i.e., no need to specify the max length), should already handle this correctly.
Example:
01 g2.
03 blah pic 9(9) binary.
03 tab occurs 0 to 10 times depending on blah.
05 d1 pic x(10).
05 d2 pic 9(9).
:
allocate g2
The above example will allocate 194 bytes here (4 + 10*19).
Please consider using the above workaround until the original Idea is put into plan. Thanks.
Could you tell us when this new feature will be effective?
This is a valid idea and has been accepted. It will be updated once put into plan.