Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Workspace COBOL Compilers
Created by Guest
Created on Oct 6, 2015

Cobol V5 - RULE(unique_option) instead of RULES(multi_options)

In Cobol V5, use of RULES option require to list all suboptions.
We think it would be more flexible to give RULE one by one, and it would be more evolutive (support new suboptions and perhaps client/site rules).

Idea priority Low
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 13, 2017

    This feature is now available in Enterprise COBOL V6.1.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 25, 2015

    We do agree that the docs can be improved. As a result, we will be accepting this RFE to improve the documentation only. The RFE will be moved to 'Uncommitted Candidate'.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 4, 2015

    Thanks for your reply.

    The documentation does not mention that the RULES can be specified more than once, and it causes confusion in stating "It is not necessary to specify all of the suboptions for RULES. If a suboption is not specified, the default takes effect."... It might be assumed that each occurrence of RULES reset options to their defaults.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 4, 2015

    This RFE is being rejected on the grounds that this functionality already exists.

    Users can specify RULES with no suboptions like this:
    CBL RULES

    and get all defaults:
    RULES(ENDPERIOD,EVENPACK,LAXPERF,SLACKBYTES)

    Or users can specify single suboptions at a time like this:
    CBL RULES(NOENDP)
    CBL RULES(NOSLCKB)

    and get this in effect, which is the 2 specified options merged with the defaults:
    RULES(NOENDPERIOD,EVENPACK,LAXPERF,NOSLACKBYTES)

    Please let us know if this still does not achieve what you are looking for. Thanks.