Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Feb 26, 2015

Request to retain PSB and DBD COMMENTS in IMS Explorer toolset & IMS Catalog

Travelers needs both the IMS Explorer toolset and the IMS Catalog to retain PSB/DBD COMMENTS.

We have historical tracking comments at the top of our PSBs and DBDs.
The comments we want to keep are at the top. We don't care about the ones in the middle. We use that comment area on top to keep track of who & why the DBD was updated. It helps a lot if projects get cancelled or stalled.
We do not need to add or modify any comments in IMS Explorer. If changes are needed to the comments, we'll modify source before we add the DBD into Endevor to be genned.

In addition, we also need to store this information in the catalog for those occasions where we will be loading the metadata for an IMS Explorer project from an existing catalog vs the original DBD/PSB source.

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 9, 2020

    Hi Robert,
    My apologies. In my previous note, I put down the wrong RFE#. The correct RFE# should have been 67100.
    Thank you.
    Sincerely,
    Deepak Kohli - deepakk@us.ibm.com

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 9, 2020

    Hi Robert,
    Thank you for your interest in keeping IMS a vital and successful product. Software development has continuously evolved during IMS's lifetime, and so has IMS itself. We have kept pace with, adopted, and implemented many industry standard best practices within our organization, including Continuous Delivery, Design Thinking, and Agile.

    When choosing new features to add from the list of requirements in our backlog, we assess which will bring the most value to as many clients as possible and prioritize those.

    At this time, after reviewing this request for enhancement and assessing its potential value, we have decided to reject it. We think it’s a great idea and we have marked this as a futures candidate but we are rejecting RFE 58299 because we don’t feel we can deliver it within the next 18-24 months which is the goal we have set for RFE deliverables as part of our IMS Gold program. You are welcome to resubmit this RFE at a later date and we will reconsider but as I mentioned we have also marked this down as a futures candidate item to be looked at down the road.
    We appreciate your input to IMS, and we hope that you will continue to submit ideas for improvements as customer feedback is a key component to shaping the future direction of IMS.

    Thank you.
    Sincerely,
    Deepak Kohli - deepakk@us.ibm.com