This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
When migrating programs from legacy languages like Cobol or RPG to EGL we often encounter the problem that in all these languages the programmer has control about how long a program stays in memory.
- In Cobol the developer just can CANCEL another program in memory.
- In RPG the program itself determines according to the status of *INLR if it should stay in memory or not after leaving the program.
In EGL programs and all their variable content is lost after leaving a called program. There we only have the possibility to create a library which is a whole other thing compared to a called program.
This major architectural difference between legacy code and EGL makes it very difficult to do highly automated migrations.
So what we would need is an enhancement that is similar to the COBOL CANCEL instruction.
- PGM A (main) calls B
- B returns but stays in memory
- A calls B again
- B now works with all the values from the first call but the parametes
- B returns but stays in memory
- A says ... ok, don't need B anymore, I'll CANCEL it. B is now removed from memory.
Especially in Java generation this would also have a major impact on performance because we reuse all the objects already available from the first call.
This feature is needed for Java generation as well as for Cobol generation. From a performance perspective the implementation for Java Generation is more critical for us. From a functional perspective this enhancement is critical for Java as well as for Cobol generation.
Idea priority | High |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Programming Languages
Product - Business Developer
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Rational
Product family - Design & development
Product - Business Developer
In RBD 7.5.1.5, a new annotation, unloadOnExit, has been added to control when a called program instance should be reused. See the product documentation for the details on how to use this option in Java and COBOL environments
This RFE's Headline was changed after submission to reflect the headline of an internal request we were already considering, but will now track here.
We agree that this would have a positive effect on runtime performance. We hope to implement this in a 7.5.x fix pack.