Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Categories EGL Language
Created by Guest
Created on Dec 20, 2016

Array initialization with a variable size

Initialize any array directly using a numeric variable as the new size
throws syntax error.
ie
x int = 2;
myArr myRec[x];
Or
myArr = new myRec[x];
Or even
myArr = new myRec[myotherArr.getSize()];
all the 3 bold statements are not available in the compilation time with
Error (IWN.VAL.3263.e 53/53 Invalid array size x. Array sizes must be
non-negative integer literals).

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 28, 2022
    This feature was delivered in version 9.7.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 21, 2017

    The feature that is described in this request is a candidate for a future release.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 6, 2017

    A preliminary evaluation of this request indicates that it is consistent with our business strategy. Further evaluation of this RFE is underway.