This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Although the semantics of parameter passing in called programs is call-by-reference, the argument is copied in order to enable implicit type conversion. However, KBC applications always calls programs with an argument whose type is identical to the parameter's. Hence no type coercion and therefore no copy is required.
When a new element needs to be added to an array, the natural way of doing so is by using such functions as appendElement() and insertElement(). This turns out to be suboptimal because these functions are call-by-value and hence copy their argument. The rationale for this copy is that a type coercion may be needed from the type of the actual argument to the type of the elements of the target array.
At KBC, these type coercions are usually not needed as the runtime type of the argument is identical to the formal parameter type. In these circumstances we request that the EGL implementation avoids a copy.
We've been investigation this together with IBM already (Paul Hoffman and Matthew Heitz).
Idea priority | Medium |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Programming Languages
Product - Business Developer
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Rational
Product family - Design & development
Product - Business Developer
This RFE's Headline was changed after submission to reflect the headline of an internal request we were already considering, but will now track here.
This feature has been implemented in fix pack 7.5.1.5
Thank you for this suggestion. This is one of several enhancements we are looking at to improve Java runtime performance when processing structured records. We expect to implement improvements in this area in a 7.5.x fix pack.