Skip to Main Content
IBM Z Software


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Z Software products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Categories Other
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 30, 2018

ISPF ISRSUPC to permit FINDALL to work against individual PDS members

Add an MVS ISPF ISRSUPC/SuperC search option similar to FINDALL that works against discrete members of a PDS.

ISRSUPC's FINDALL process option returns a positive match only if all SRCHFOR criteria are met. This works fine for a sequential file; however, if the input file is a PDS, it returns a positive match if any of the criteria are met in any of the members of the entire PDS.

I would like to add an option, for instance FINDALLM or somesuch, which would behave like FINDALL, yet treat each discrete PDS member as if it was an individual sequential file, and thus only return a positive match for any member only if all SRCHFOR criteria are met for that member.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 18, 2020

    The suggested enhancement as originally described was not considered practical, and we did not get any response to an alternative suggestion. We have logged the alternative suggestion as a possible future minor enhancement. We are however clearly unable to proceed with the original RFE enhancement, so we are closing it as rejected.

    Jonathan Scott, HLASM and Toolkit team

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 21, 2018

    The current FINDALL option primarily sets the return code after a search according to whether all search strings are flagged as having been matched somewhere. It still shows the matches as it scans the files even if not all matches are found.

    When multiple PDS members are being scanned, it is difficult to see how an equivalent option could work. The suggestion that matches for a member are only to be listed if the member matches all strings would require deferral and buffering of a potentially unlimited amount of output, which would require major changes that do not seem justified.

    Would it perhaps be enough to add an optional output line after each member saying how many of the search strings matched, for example in the form "n of m search strings matched", which would make it easy to scan for cases where all match? This would have to be optional because ISPF SRCHFOR post-processes the current SUPERC output format and could be confused by additional lines, in which case it would need a separate update to tolerate them. I suspect there might be other programs which do the same.

    Also, as there is only one return code, it cannot indicate multiple results, but it could for example be set to 1 if all strings matched in at least one member.

    It's not difficult to write a post-processing utility to read the output (as suggested) and list files with any combination of matches (not just ALL, but any logical combination) so I think that would be a simpler and more flexible solution for now.

    Given that alternative solution, competing requirements and limited development resources, even the simple suggested solution of a message "n of m search strings matched" would not necessarily be accepted for implementation in the near future, but in my opinion it appears it would provide useful function for a reasonably small development effort.

    Jonathan Scott, HLASM and Toolkit team

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 21, 2018

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Enterprise Tooling
    Product - High Level Assembler (HLASM)
    Component - Other
    Operating system - IBM z/OS
    Source - None

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - z Systems Software
    Product - z/OS
    Component - ISPF
    Operating system - IBM z/OS
    Source - None